Read posts about yahoo

February 1

Microhoo: Microsoft Offers $44.6B to Acquire Yahoo (Martin Gordon's Blog (cptncelchu)) by Martin

Yesterday I was meaning to write about Amazon's $300 million acquisition of Audible, a match made in heaven, but today comes news that Microsoft is offering $45 billion for Yahoo, which pretty much eclipses the relatively straightforward Amazon/Audible deal.

There were no shortage of rumors regarding a MSFT/YHOO merger/acquisition in 2007, but no formal proposal was actually ever made public and Yahoo came out and said that a deal didn't make sense on account of the potential upside of the restructuring and strategic initiatives set for 2007. As Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer states, a year has passed and the competitive landscape still hasn't changed. Indeed, Project Panama has done little to improve Yahoo's situation in the advertising space and search seems to be in the place that it's been in a while - an ever more distant #2 to Google. Perhaps even more indicative of Yahoo's true status, however, was this week's announcement of plans to layoff 1,000 employees.

In the eyes of most consumers, both Microsoft and Yahoo provide second-rate products. In the operating system space, especially with the lukewarm reception Vista received, Microsoft only has their incumbency to stand on. In the internet space, MSN is to Yahoo what Yahoo is to Google, if that. Yahoo does have some great properties, but they aren't the cash cows that search and advertising are, and receive both media and internal attention according. The growth opportunities of the workhorse properties, however unglamorous, are still growth opportunities and still have yet to be harnessed and perhaps this deal is the only way that these properties will get attention.

The deal makes sense to me from a competitive perspective, but does it make sense internally? Can these two behemoths really merge operations and culture well enough to come out a stronger entity? Or will their internal focus distract them so much that Google will be able to distance itself even more from Microhoo? I don't know enough about the internals of Yahoo or Microsoft, but I know that the success of this merger will depend on a few factors, including the compatibility between the cultures and structures of both companies and the appropriate handling of redundant properties.

In the end, I look forward to this deal going through. I think it will revitalize both companies, which appear to have been operating at less-than-full capacity over the past few years. In this sense, although fewer competitors in a market tend to decrease competition in that market, I think we'll see the opposite here. Though there's a very subtle feeling out there that since both are so behind the competition, both Microsoft and Yahoo are about to, or should, give up. This acquisition will give the resulting entity a much better leg to stand on against the competition.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in: internet , microsoft , online , thoughts , yahoo
June 21

Google and Yahoo Afraid Of Microsoft? (Martin Gordon's Blog (cptncelchu)) by Martin

I can't believe I missed this: Google Gears is available for WebKit. This was announced three weeks ago, but I just found out about it on this TUAW post regarding future Google/Apple iPhone-related announcements.

News of this makes me feel better about AJAX/HTML based apps on the iPhone, easing my concern over offline access to these apps. I also haven't seen many developers complaining about the lack of a "real" SDK on the iPhone, which makes me believe that offline access and home screen placement was discussed at NDA-covered WWDC sessions.

A big question I have is that amongst all this Google/Apple collaboration, Apple decided to go with Yahoo for the iPhone's bundled email solution and widgets (you'll note that the Stocks and Weather widgets now sport Y! icons). Could Apple be playing both sides? If Google and Yahoo were desperate to get placement on the iPhone, then perhaps they didn't want to (or couldn't get) exclusivity. Google and Yahoo are currently tied on home screen icon placement at two a piece (Yahoo is slightly ahead overall because of the mail tie-in, however).

The biggest loser in all of this is of course is Microsoft. The one-two punch: iPhone is going to take away customers from the Windows Mobile platform (RIM sure isn't helping them out either). Thanks to the Google/Yahoo integration, iPhone users will have an investment in Google and Yahoo's online services, driving usage away from MSN/Windows Live/whatever it's called now. After the iPhone, Microsoft will be facing increased competition from both the mobile space and the internet space.

There is a bright side to all of this for Microsoft. From any way you look at it, Microsoft is seen as the biggest competition to Google and Yahoo: Either Google and Yahoo compromised to "share" the iPhone, in which case they don't think they can handle Microsoft alone, or Apple didn't want only Google or only Yahoo on the iPhone, in which case Apple thinks that Google and/or Yahoo are vulnerable to Microsoft.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Posted in: apple , google , iphone , microsoft , mobile , offline , windows , yahoo
February 9

The web as a switchboard, Yahoo Pipes (Put together quickly (Haligan)) by michaelb

Pasha Sadri and his teammates at Yahoo released Yahoo Pipes this week. To any Unix user the name itself pretty much explains what it does, but after using the editor I think it would help the average computer user to think of it as the web’s switchboard. As their calls (data) gets plugged into other parties (modules) they get to have the conversation they where looking for.

I’m pretty impressed after working with it for a bit this morning and I only had a few issues. First it crashed Safari and performance has been very slow for me in the Mac version of FireFox (2.0.0.1) with modules taking a while to drag into the editor and for content to refresh, but with their message on adding capacity and how their server was overloaded from an unexpected high demand I expect these issue to go away soon.

After this morning here are a few pointers and a couple of things to keep in mind. When using either “For Each” (Annotate or Replace), sometimes the source or pipe module doesn’t refresh its fields to reflect the data that is coming into the “For Each” module. Try refreshing the module or modules prior to it to get the correct fields. Also sometimes just toggling the “to” (all items / first item) field in it does the trick. It took me a while to find where to rename a pipe, all you need to do is click the name while in edit mode and you’ll be able to change the name from there.

Posted in: pipes , web services , yahoo

The web as a switchboard, Yahoo Pipes (Put together quickly (Haligan)) by michaelb

Pasha Sadri and his teammates at Yahoo released Yahoo Pipes this week. To any Unix user the name itself pretty much explains what it does, but after using the editor I think it would help the average computer user to think of it as the web’s switchboard. As their calls (data) gets plugged into other parties (modules) they get to have the conversation they where looking for.

I’m pretty impressed after working with it for a bit this morning and I only had a few issues. First it crashed Safari and performance has been very slow for me in the Mac version of FireFox (2.0.0.1) with modules taking a while to drag into the editor and for content to refresh, but with their message on adding capacity and how their server was overloaded from an unexpected high demand I expect these issue to go away soon.

After this morning here are a few pointers and a couple of things to keep in mind. When using either “For Each” (Annotate or Replace), sometimes the source or pipe module doesn’t refresh its fields to reflect the data that is coming into the “For Each” module. Try refreshing the module or modules prior to it to get the correct fields. Also sometimes just toggling the “to” (all items / first item) field in it does the trick. It took me a while to find where to rename a pipe, all you need to do is click the name while in edit mode and you’ll be able to change the name from there.

Posted in: pipes , web services , yahoo

The web as a switchboard, Yahoo Pipes (Put together quickly (Haligan)) by michaelb

Pasha Sadri and his teammates at Yahoo released Yahoo Pipes this week. To any Unix user the name itself pretty much explains what it does, but after using the editor I think it would help the average computer user to think of it as the web’s switchboard. As their calls (data) gets plugged into other parties (modules) they get to have the conversation they where looking for.

I’m pretty impressed after working with it for a bit this morning and I only had a few issues. First it crashed Safari and performance has been very slow for me in the Mac version of FireFox (2.0.0.1) with modules taking a while to drag into the editor and for content to refresh, but with their message on adding capacity and how their server was overloaded from an unexpected high demand I expect these issue to go away soon.

After this morning here are a few pointers and a couple of things to keep in mind. When using either “For Each” (Annotate or Replace), sometimes the source or pipe module doesn’t refresh its fields to reflect the data that is coming into the “For Each” module. Try refreshing the module or modules prior to it to get the correct fields. Also sometimes just toggling the “to” (all items / first item) field in it does the trick. It took me a while to find where to rename a pipe, all you need to do is click the name while in edit mode and you’ll be able to change the name from there.

Posted in: pipes , web services , yahoo
October 13

In Search Results We Trust (Martin Gordon's Blog (cptncelchu)) by Martin

Robert writes about how Windows Live search has gotten a lot better. He then wonders if it'll do them any good.

Now, the problem is, if Microsoft matches Google, who will switch away from Google? I won’t. The trust I’ve built since the late 1990s of searching Google many times a day without a problem is going to be a very hard thing to beat. To get me to switch Microsoft will have to be better than Google.

How about you? Does Microsoft (or Yahoo or Ask) have any hope of getting you to switch your default search engine?

I have to agree with him. Any time I use a search that's not Google, I'm left with the lingering thought, "Is there something missing here that Google would find?" I trust Google's search results completely. I'm not quite there yet with any other service. And I don't think I ever will be. First of all, I'm probably not going to search my default search engine, but if I did, I'd most likely go through a trust-earning period where I'd double-check all my searches in Google. It would probably be way too much overhead to be worthwhile. I'm right back to Google.

Heck, when I directed one of my Yahoo-favoring friends to do a web search, I told him to "just use Google" without even waiting to see if what we were looking for was in the page results.

Something as simple as the name has a profound effect on search engine choice. "Just google it" sounds right. "Just live.com it", "just yahoo it", or "just ask.com it" sound awkward.

So will just being better than Google get me to switch? Probably not, since I'll have no way of knowing.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in: google , internet , microsoft , search , thoughts , yahoo