Read posts about search

September 4

Counterpoint: The State of Search on the Kindle (Tiny Screenfuls (JoshB)) by Josh Bancroft

(Over on the Intel Software Network blog, software ninja Clay Breshears put up a post today about why he will “Never Own an Electronic Book”. Turns out his frustration stems from how hard it is to search for something, if you don’t know exactly what you’re searching for. This is a problem not just for ebooks and readers like the Kindle, but for the web and our text-oriented world in general.

I typed up a response to Clay in a comment, which I’m reproducing here, because I think it illustrates that things aren’t as bad as they seem, and not yet as good as they should be.)

Clay, you make a very good point, but it seems to be aimed at the effectiveness of search in general, rather than just on ebook readers (though they suffer in the same way). Just like prices can only come down, I hope that natural language search can only get better from here.

That said, as a rabid Kindle fan, the situation there might not be as bad as you fear. ;-)

When you search on a Kindle, it searches across all the books you have on the device (it indexes them during idle time while you’re reading, and new books show up in the index quickly). And here’s what the search results page looks like:


Image credit Robert Mohns via Flickr

It shows you how many results were found in each book, and by selecting that book, you can quickly skip back and forth between the hits.

Notice that there are also options to find results from the web, Wikipedia, the Kindle Store, and the built-in dictionary on the Kindle, if what you’re looking for isn’t in one of your books.

Search DOES need to get better, but I’m pretty happy with how well it works on the Kindle today. Come by next time you’re in the neighborhood, and I’ll give you a demo! :-)

Posted in: amazon , blog , counterpoint , kindle , language , search
March 17

Rudimentary search capabilities added (Kilala.nl (Cailin Coilleach)) by Cailin Coilleach

Hooray for another new feature to the website: searching \o/

Right now it's rudimentary at best, with the following limitations:
* It only searches through titles and blog post contents. No tags or articles outside the database.
* You cannot use (double) quotes to strong together queries like "os x". The quotes will be removed by Dirk's MakeSafe function and thus the search will find all posts containing both os and x.

Still, better than nothing ^_^ Now all I need to do is enter all the blog posts from before July 2005 into the database.

Posted in: new features , search , utfs , website
March 7

Post Updates to Twitter right from your Firefox Search Bar! [ma.gnolia] (Put together quickly (Haligan)) by MichaelBiven

Post Updates to Twitter right from your Firefox Search Bar!

Tags: , , ,

Posted in: firefox , plugin , search , twitter
February 23

Welcome to Solr [ma.gnolia] (Put together quickly (Haligan)) by MichaelBiven

Welcome to Solr

Solr is an open source enterprise search server based on the Lucene Java search library, with XML/HTTP and JSON APIs, hit highlighting, faceted search, caching, replication, and a web administration interface. It runs in a Java servlet container such as Tomcat.

Tags: , ,

Posted in: lucene , search , solr
October 13

In Search Results We Trust (Martin Gordon's Blog (cptncelchu)) by Martin

Robert writes about how Windows Live search has gotten a lot better. He then wonders if it'll do them any good.

Now, the problem is, if Microsoft matches Google, who will switch away from Google? I won’t. The trust I’ve built since the late 1990s of searching Google many times a day without a problem is going to be a very hard thing to beat. To get me to switch Microsoft will have to be better than Google.

How about you? Does Microsoft (or Yahoo or Ask) have any hope of getting you to switch your default search engine?

I have to agree with him. Any time I use a search that's not Google, I'm left with the lingering thought, "Is there something missing here that Google would find?" I trust Google's search results completely. I'm not quite there yet with any other service. And I don't think I ever will be. First of all, I'm probably not going to search my default search engine, but if I did, I'd most likely go through a trust-earning period where I'd double-check all my searches in Google. It would probably be way too much overhead to be worthwhile. I'm right back to Google.

Heck, when I directed one of my Yahoo-favoring friends to do a web search, I told him to "just use Google" without even waiting to see if what we were looking for was in the page results.

Something as simple as the name has a profound effect on search engine choice. "Just google it" sounds right. "Just live.com it", "just yahoo it", or "just ask.com it" sound awkward.

So will just being better than Google get me to switch? Probably not, since I'll have no way of knowing.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Posted in: google , internet , microsoft , search , thoughts , yahoo